Because You Needed Another Article on Mad Men [tv]
I’m always amazed when a show can take a total abstraction and make it a vital part of the show. You layer that kind of an approach on top of quality writing, and you have something special. The level of misogynistic behavior in Mad Men is horrifying, and yet strangely sympathetic. As they peel back the layers of the men, we begin to see the hallmarks of the easiest psychological weaknesses that cause them to act as they do. Yet, at the same time, the misogyny is what drives the women to act both ruthlessly, exploiting their feminism for gain, and also to act desperately in their attempts to hold down a man and fit into the vision that 1960’s society carved out for them. It’s a smart play on the All in the Family rule, where instead of LAUGHING at the pigs, we feel for them. Instead of wanting to defend the women, we shake our heads a bit. We’re armed with the knowledge of how the story on a broad scale plays out, and we find ourselves maybe finding sympathy where ten or twenty years ago we would’ve found anger or disgust.
That’s not to say that any of it is excusable. I’ve written about misogyny on this blog before (because I LOVE it), and if you ask me, one need only to look at this recent presidential campaign to see how far away we are from having any mind of equality in terms of gender relations in this country and in this era. But Mad Men continues that grand tradition of television in challenging us, and making us rethink how we might see the good guys and the bad guys, and what it means to be a “man” in the most colloquial sense of the word. Sometimes it’s the difference between merely acting the part, or selling the part. Because everyone’s buying something, whether they know it or not.
